ABSTRACT
Background: Saraswatarishta (SA) is a herbo-mineral formulation consisting of 18 plants some of which are Medhyarasayanas. It has been claimed to be useful in treating central nervous system disorders. Objective: To evaluate antidepressant effect of ‘Saraswatarishta’(SA) alone and in combination with imipramine and fluoxetine in animal models of depression. Materials and Methods: After obtaining IAEC permission, 144 rats (n = 36/part) were randomized into 6 groups‑ Group 1: Distilled water (1 mL), Group 2: Imipramine (30 mg/kg), Group 3: Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), Group 4: SA (1.8 mL/kg), Group 5: Imipramine + SA, Group 6: Fluoxetine + SA. Effects of study drugs were evaluated in forced swim test (FST) with single exposure to FST (Part 1) and repeated exposure for 14 days (Part 2). In Part 3, reserpine was used with FST and effects of study drugs were evaluated against single exposure to FST. Same model was used with repeated exposures to FST (Part 4). In each part, rats were subjected to open field test (OFT) for 5 min prior to final FST. The variables measured: Immobility time in FST; line crossing, rearing and defecation in the OFT. Results: In all four parts, individual drugs and combinations thereof produced significant decrease in immobility time as compared to control, and extent of decrease was comparable amongst these groups. However, values for combination of fluoxetine with SA group were found to be lesser than that for individual agents in Parts 2 and 3. Combination of SA with imipramine did not enhance its anti‑depressant effect in any of the parts. OFT findings did not vary significantly amongst the study groups. Conclusion: Decreased immobility in FST and absence of generalized stimulation or depression of motor activity in OFT point towards potential antidepressant effect of Saraswatarishta. Its co‑administration with fluoxetine showed more promising effects.
ABSTRACT
Context: Extracellular glutamate level in reward centre of brain increases during ethanol drinking sessions. Hence, it can be hypothesized that drugs which decrease extracellular glutamate might have deaddictive properties. It has been shown that β-lactam antibiotics are potent stimulators of glutamate transporter 1(GLT1) expression. Previous studies have shown that ceftriaxone decreases ethanol consumption but this has not been compared to standard line of treatment (naltrexone). Also, no study was conducted for testing ampicillin even if in an in-vitro experiment ampicillin has shown to increase GLT1 levels more than ceftriaxone. Hence, our study’s objectives were to compare efficacy of ceftriaxone and ampicillin with naltrexone on ethanol consumption in rats. Methods: Permission of ethics committee was taken. Study was divided into two parts. Part I included standardization of model & Part II included 8 groups of six rats each. Group 1: vehicle control, Group 2: 1mg/kg/d naltrexone, Group 3: 100mg/kg/d ceftriaxone, Group 4: 200mg/kg/d ceftriaxone, Group 5: 100mg/kg/d ampicillin, Group 6: 200mg/kg/d ampicillin were given i.p injections for 15 days and Group 7: 200mg/kg ceftriaxone & Group 8: 200mg/kg ampicillin i.p. single dose. Parameters measured were ethanol & water intake per day for 15 days. Results: Groups 2 to 8 showed statistically significant decrease in ethanol intake as compared to vehicle control. Also, group 3 & 4 showed an increase in water consumption as compared to Group 1. Conclusions: Our study recommends that drugs acting on glutamate pathways like ceftriaxone and ampicillin can be explored for treatment of alcohol dependence.
ABSTRACT
Effects of bromocriptine and sulpiride were observed on encoding and retrieval of spatial memory in wistar rats using Hebb-Williams complex maze. Rat was placed in entry chamber and allowed to reach reward chamber. Ten trials were given each day per rat for 3 consecutive days. Within-day encoding score indicative of learning and between-day retrieval score indicative of memory were calculated. Effects of bromocriptine and sulpiride were observed on encoding and retrieval of spatial memory. General learning index was calculated to compare the effect on spatial memory between groups. Bromocriptine increased while sulpiride decreased within-day encoding index but had no effect on retrieval index. In general learning index, sulpiride group showed more errors whereas bromocriptine group did not show any difference as compared to control. These results suggest that dopamine D2 receptors are involved in memory encoding but not retrieval. Also general learning is under positive modulation by D2 receptors.